On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 04:18:44PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > If we can't get an upstream reaction (which seems probable), maybe > Petr and Sebastian can at least cross-check their patches and come up > with a common one? > The Debian patch is more future proof as it assumes the old OpenSSL will disappear in favor of the new one. I like it. On the other hand it brings many OpenSSL-licensed code into the patch. That can be unacceptable for someone.
I developed my patch because at that time I did not know about the Debian patch. There was no upstream bug report linking to it. I'm fine with your patch. But I even do not maintain the package in Fedora, so I'm not going to touch the package again unless it breaks. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
