On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 02:56:24PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > to explain: we only test main, as using and or even building packages > > from contrib or non-free might be problematic. > Well, FWIW, intel-microcode and amd64-microcode have been manually > checked to be safe to autobuild (and tagged as such, XS-autobuild: yes). > In fact, they're autobuilt in unstable.
yes, sure, those three packages are fine, but we are only testing main
and not contrib and non-free because *in general* we cannot now whether
we can legally build them. that's why i said I would be fine with a
whitelisting solution… but we dont have that yet.
> I would be happy enough if someone would check the patch in this bug
> report for amd64-microcode *once*.
I believe this is on lamby's agenda…
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
