On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Michalis Kamburelis
<michalis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. The utility of "ppdep" for Pascal is limited anyway. Unlike in C,
> in Pascal the compiler already handles the dependencies (what unit
> should be recompiled when and in what order). So generating Makefiles
> with dependencies per-unit is usually not needed.
It's necessary to avoid race conditions if you have multiple programs
that use the same units. E.g. `texutil.{o,ppu}` get opened (with
`O_TRUNCATE`) multiple times, rather than using atomic renames (which
would still be duplicate work ... but fpc is fast anyway. Still bad if
the compiler fails and `make` hasn't had a chance to clean up) or
locking.
I refuse to use `.NOTPARALLEL:` out of principle.
I can live with the other limitations - IMHO reasonable code won't do
*too* much of that, at least for things that `ppdep` even needs to
worry about.
Thanks for the quick response,
-Ben
