On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:39:13 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 22/11/16 10:29, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-Cc: iptab...@packages.debian.org > > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html > > > > src:iptables contains libxtables, which bumped SONAME recently, > > starting a small uncoordinated transition. For extra confusion, > > libxtables.so.12 was briefly shipped in libxtables11 (#844755); > > Huh. > > > after that was fixed, until today's upload, libxtables12 was missing > > the required Breaks/Replaces to take over libxtables.so.12 from > > the versions of libxtables11 that suffered from #844755 (#845278). > > > > At a minimum, this is going to need a round of binNMUs to get > > everything correctly depending on libxtables12. > > To the maintainer: Why bump to a snapshot at this point in the cycle? Have the > rdeps been build-tested against the new libxtables? Are you aware we are in > the > transition freeze and this is a transition? > FWIW I think sid should revert back to 1.6.0, and iptables can be updated to a new version, hopefully not a snapshot, after stretch.
Cheers, Julien
