Steve Langasek wrote: > No, they are not. User mounts are a well-established concept, and > smbmnt behaves inconsistently with respect to them.
I agree that the case you showed is broken. In that case, root has implicitly granted fiddling permission in the given directory through the fstab entry, so no more checks should be required. When running smbmount from the shell, however, there has got to be some check or else you could overwrite any directory whatsoever. I don't know of any precedent how that sort of thing should be handled. I think that the owner check should be enough, though. Maybe the permission mode check should just be removed? Any other ideas how to handle this (modulo the ever-popular opinion of not making the binaries setuid :) ) ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
