On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:06:49PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > For now, I have backported the fixes to the released, but Qt4-based
> > 1.4.3~beta1 version, to resolve the current FTBFS with a targeted fix.
> > The changes are uploaded to the debian-med/ball repository on alioth,
> > pending your review and upload.
>
> Build is just running ... I'll come back later in case of any issues
> I feel unable to deal with myself.
Unfortunately I have hit a new problem in an up to date unstable chroot:
...
Start 197: AmberFF_test
197/334 Test #197: AmberFF_test .................................***Failed
0.19 sec
Version: 1.4.79
checking AmberFF()... passed
checking ~AmberFF()... passed
checking AmberFF(const AmberFF& force_field, bool clone_deep = true)... passed
checking specificSetup()... passed
checking energy test 1 (Single Stretch) [AMBER91]... passed
checking energy test 2 (Bend) [AMBER91]... passed
checking energy test 3 (VdW) [AMBER91]... passed
checking energy test 4 (Torsion) [AMBER91]... passed
checking energy test 5 (AlaGlySer) [AMBER91]... passed
checking energy test 6 (AlaGlySer) [AMBER94]... passed
checking force test 1 (Torsion) [AMBER94]... passed
checking force test 2: ES switching function [AMBER91/CDIEL]... passed
checking force test 3: ES switching function [AMBER91/RDIEL]... passed
checking force test 4: VdW switching function [AMBER91]... passed
checking [EXTRA] Energies w/ selection... passed
checking [EXTRA] Additivity of energies w/ selection...
(line 511 TEST_REAL_EQUAL(r4_r1 - r4_i, r1_r4 - r1_i): got -145.471,
expected -103.957) -
(line 513 TEST_REAL_EQUAL(r1_r4 - r1_i + r1_tpl + r4_tpl + tpl_i,
total_energy): got 1680.36, expected 1638.84) -
FAILED
FAILED
Start 198: MMFF94_test
...
99% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 334
Total Test time (real) = 73.78 sec
The following tests FAILED:
197 - AmberFF_test (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
Makefile:72: recipe for target 'test' failed
> > In that process, I tried building various stages of upstream master, and
> > bae96ab4 'Merge branch issue_596' might be a candidate for a snapshot
> > (entire testsuite passes). However, there is the problem that
> > QtWebEngine is not yet included in Debian, so I could only build recent
> > master if I explicitly disabled support with -DUSE_QTWEBENGINE=OFF. I
> > am not sure if this would be a good thing for users.
>
> I admit that I have no idea whether this is a real constraint. I added
> Steffen in CC who might raise his opinion.
Considering Steffen's answer it might be worth trying the said snapshot
if this might be fixed there.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
