Hi Petter,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:07:47AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> I have not followed this issue closely, but started reading on Andreas
> request.
Thanks a lot for your quick response.
> First of all, I believe this issue is based on incorrect documentation.
Yes.
> The task files have never been RFC822 compliant. I agree that they
> should be RFC822 compliant, but the only handled continuation method
> implemented have always been using backslash at the end of the previous
> line.
>
> Moving to full RFC822 compliance is probably best done with a test suite
> in place, to verify that existing task files still produce the expected
> set of tasks after such change.
Fully ACK.
> [Andreas Tille]
> > Petter, could you please have a look at the patch provided by Ole[1]?
>
> I had a look and tested a bit, and it look good to me. The old style
> backslash continuation used by Debian Edu continue to work, and the new
> RFC822 style continuation start working. I believe it should be applied
> and uploaded to Debian.
>
> Should I commit it?
Yes please. Ole, you reported problems with your patch. Could you
please be more verbose about this problem - at best based on Petter's
commit to make sure we are all working on the same code?
Thanks again Petter for your always reliable support
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
