Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi,
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:02:22 +0300 Ilias Tsitsimpis <i.tsitsim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since commit 0e71b40, `--extra-repository' cannot be used with > `--no-apt-update' (i.e., the extra repositories are not being used). I would say that this is a feature instead of a bug. Imagine it were the other way round and sbuild would run "apt-get update" even if --no-apt-update was specified, then I would get another bug report "sbuild runs apt-get update even though --no-apt-update was given". With what justification would you still run "apt-get update" even if --no-apt-update was passed? I would've said that a user who uses --extra-repositories just must not use --no-apt-update. Maybe sbuild should even print a warning if they attempt to do so. Notice for example, that there also exists the --chroot-update-failed-commands hook which will only get executed if "apt-get update" failed. A user might not expect the code given by --chroot-update-failed-commands to be run if --no-apt-update is in effect. They might experience unexpected side-effects if that code is still run even though --no-apt-update is passed. Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
