Hallo Andreas,

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:51:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> what according to Vcs-Git is the place where the package is maintained.
> Olivier and Christian - if you are interested in some commits helping to
> solve this bug please make sure the status of Git reflects the actual
> packaging.

commit-wise, the package is practically ready for upload; I'd only run
final tests and change `UNRELEASED` to `unstable`, and maybe check with
DPMT whether I can add the team to uploaders before the package is
transitioned to DPMT practices.

What's holding it back is the sparqlwrapper upload; quoteing myself in
#761177:

> Apart from the required uscan run, all the package needs AFAICT is
> updating the copyright file with the new fourth author from AUTHORS.md,
> bumping compat and standards-version (without further changes) and
> `s/(Python \(.\))/\1/` on the package description lines just if you want
> to make lintian very happy.
> 
> I'm unfamiliar with the SVN workflows, so I could only offer to prepare
> an NMU, but that might cause more work later in SVN than doing it right
> the first time.

If you want to help, this is probably where you could advance things
most effectively. (I'm still reading up on the git-dpm workflow; as
you're familiar with the SVN one, you could just apply the above changes
staying in SVN and do a team upload).

(Plus, I'll need a sponsor then for the rdflib upload).

Thanks
chrysn

-- 
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
  -- Bene Gesserit axiom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to