On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:14:18 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > The prob is that currently, with sdl1, virglrenderer doesn't quite > work. It works with sdl2 or gtk frontends, sdl1 support is very > limited. > > So in order for virglrenderer to be useful, other changes are needed. > Which I'm currently evaluating. The prob is that I tried to switch > to sdl2 before already, users complained about missing features which > were found in sdl1 support.
What features did users complain about? May be today it's not relevant anymore. And SDL1 eventually should get deprecated (especially since it won't work with Wayland), so users should eventually stop relying on it. I'm not sure it's even supported upstream today. I'd say now more and more would complain that virgl isn't supported because of sticking to SDL1, so you'd need to consider what's more important. But if you can figure support for both SDL1 and SDL2 at the same time as a runtime choice, that would be of course ideal including legacy cases. Best regards, Hillel Lubman.