Hi, > Moving GHC 8 to LLVM 3.8 would be possible with some minor patches from > upstream, though the lack of LLVM 3.8 on armel would be a big problem. Also > I'm > not sure the GHC maintainers want to deviate from upstream on the LLVM > version. > But we can move to 3.7 and drop 3.5 for now, then after that has happened, > consider if we can move to 3.8 and what we do with armel. >
what about shipping llvm 3.7 only for arch:all, arm64, armel and armhf? this way we can remove it from mostly everywhere and let it migrate without caring of i386 and amd64 anymore. Does this sound crazy? G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
