Package: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl Version: 2.085 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer,
I noticed that the check for the debian-uri in Dpkg/Control/Source.pl is different between Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git, the former checks for "cgit" in the path while the latter checks for "git" in the path. This can lead to some confusion. Case 1, if the same value is used on the two fileds, a warning is emitted for only one of the two, e.g.: Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/davmail.git/ Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/davmail.git Case 2, if different values are used cme can be tricked into not issuing warnings at all, e.g.: Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/davmail.git/ Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-java/davmail.git In both cases I'd expect the debian-uri warning on both the fields. Thanks, Antonio -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libconfig-model-dpkg-perl depends on: ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.30 ii libarray-intspan-perl 2.003-1 ii libconfig-model-perl 2.092-1 ii libexporter-lite-perl 0.08-1 ii liblog-log4perl-perl 1.47-2 ii libmouse-perl 2.4.5-2+b1 ii libparse-recdescent-perl 1.967013+dfsg-1 ii libsoftware-license-perl 0.103012-1 ii libtext-autoformat-perl 1.740000-2 ii libtext-levenshtein-damerau-perl 0.41-1 ii liburi-perl 1.71-1 ii libwww-perl 6.15-1 ii libyaml-perl 1.18-1 ii licensecheck 3.0.24-1 ii lintian 2.5.49 ii perl 5.24.1~rc3-3 ii perl-modules-5.22 [libmodule-corelist-perl] 5.22.2-5 ii perl-modules-5.24 [libmodule-corelist-perl] 5.24.1~rc3-3 Versions of packages libconfig-model-dpkg-perl recommends: ii libconfig-model-tkui-perl 1.357-1 libconfig-model-dpkg-perl suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
