On October 26, 2016 2:30:04 AM PDT, Nathan Anderson <nat...@nja.id.au> wrote:
>In response to 'libmariadbclient18', here's a list of mariadb packages:
>
>dpkg -l | grep maria
>ii  libmariadbclient18              10.1.18+maria-1~sid         amd64  
> 
>     MariaDB database client library
>ii  libmysqlclient18                10.1.18+maria-1~sid         amd64  
> 
>     Virtual package to satisfy external depends
>ii  mariadb-client-10.1             10.1.18+maria-1~sid         amd64  
> 
>     MariaDB database client binaries
>ii  mariadb-client-core-10.1        10.1.18+maria-1~sid         amd64  
> 
>     MariaDB database core client binaries
>ii  mariadb-common                  10.1.18+maria-1~sid         all    
> 
>     MariaDB database common files (e.g. /etc/mysql/conf.d/mariadb.cnf)
>ii  mariadb-server                  10.1.18+maria-1~sid         all    
> 
>     MariaDB database server (metapackage depending on the latest 
>version)
>ii  mariadb-server-10.1             10.1.18+maria-1~sid         amd64  
> 
>     MariaDB database server binaries
>ii  mariadb-server-core-10.1        10.1.18+maria-1~sid         amd64  
> 
>     MariaDB database core server files
>ii  mysql-common                    10.1.18+maria-1~sid         all    
> 
>     MariaDB database common files (e.g. /etc/mysql/my.cnf)
>
>Postfix/postfix-mysql 3.1.0-5+b1 doesn't have this issue that's being 
>reported so are you sure it's just a bystander?

Prior to 3.1.3-1, postfix was compiled using the Debian MySQL packages.  Based 
on the guidelines provided by the Debian team that is maintaining MySQL and 
it's variants, we changed to build against the default MySQL implementation, 
which is MariaDB.

As far as I can tell, the error described in this bug report won't happen with 
the libmariadbclient18 packages in Debian.  The problem is that the packages 
provided by MariaDB are done differently (files named like a MySQL package).  

The bottom line issue is the difference between the MariaDB packages in Debian 
and those provided by MariaDB.  

Scott K

Reply via email to