On 25/10/16 12:11, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> - the second keeps the ticks at 10000, but adds 65535x100 to the > frequency, so 100ppm > > I find the calculation should be "65536x100" instead of "65535x100".
True, my fault. Sorry. > I have created the patch, enclosed. Please help to check whether it's > fine with you. > (Though it also include a fix for another issue, which you can simply ignore) I see you aligned case 2, 3 and 4 to 1 and 5, resulting in no speed change. Everything looks fine. Thanks for fixing this! Ciao -- bronto
