I think python-bitbucket can be removed. Its functionality is quite limited.
Regards El vie., 21 oct. 2016 a las 18:28, ChangZhuo Chen (<czc...@debian.org>) escribió: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates > > sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would > > consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming > > or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the > > circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file > > diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a > > last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual > > Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and > > diversions should only be used when packages provide different > > implementations for the same functionality. > > I has checked the code, and these two packages provide very different > implementation of bitbucket API. So I think the solution is mutual > Conflict. > > Another solution is removing python-bitbucket-api since I only need > python3-bitbucket-api for git-repo (#840371), and it is Python3 only. > Not sure if that is a good solution, but it can solve the problem too. > > > -- > ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czc...@debian.org> > Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) > Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D > BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B >
