Thanks, Tobias. I have finished filing bugs against all packages with reverse dependencies on jade and sp. All are blockers on the tracking bugs. I will follow up and/or NMU as necessary.
On 10/16/2016 05:26 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hi Neil, > > sorry for the late reply... Been busy recenently. > > Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 12:32 -0400 schrieb Neil Roeth: >> Hi, Tobi, >> >> The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming >> along. Openjade1.3 >> is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more >> dependencies on it. I was focusing recently on the sp binary >> package, >> and most of those dependencies have been switched to opensp. Jade is >> next. >> >> There are tracking bugs already, 811310 and 811312. > ok > >> Aboot and iputils have bugs with patches open to change sp to opensp. >> >> Can you explain the output below? I guess "dak rm jade" means remove >> jade, while the -n means not to actually do it (no act). What does >> -R >> mean? Does the command apply to the jade source package or the >> binary >> package? I'm guessing source since sp appears in the list and it is >> a >> binary package built from the jade source package. > The command checks what would happen if you remove jade from the > archives, a convenient way to check reverse dependencies you have on > jade. > >> Thanks. >> >> On 09/25/2016 07:04 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: >>> Hi Neil, >>> >>> how is the removal going? >>> I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the >>> status >>> of the progess? What do you think? >>> >>> >>> A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to: >>> >>> >>> # Broken Depends: >>> xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev >>> >>> # Broken Build-Depends: >>> aboot: sp >>> alex: jade >>> datapacker: jade >>> dejagnu: jade >>> gnome-packagekit: sp >>> gstreamer1.0: jade (>= 1.2.1) >>> iputils: sp >>> kannel: jade >>> libetpan: jade >>> lprng-doc: jade >>> mozart: sp >>> pyepl: jade >>> scons-doc: jade >>> >>> >>> -- >>> tobi >>> >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:00:50 -0400 Neil Roeth <n...@debian.org> >>> wrote: >>>> I intend to remove this package from Debian rather than update >>> it. The >>>> Debian packages openjade/opensp can be used instead. I will file >>>> bugs >>>> against any packages that depend on jade and give them some time >>>> to >>> be >>>> updated before I file the actual removal bug for jade. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Neil Roeth >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- Neil Roeth
