Hi Milan, hi Michael, Am 09.10.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Michael Stapelberg: > [+cc mejo, who did the upload in question]
Thanks for Cc'ing me. > Looking into > http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/libt/libtomcrypt/libtomcrypt_1.17-3.2+deb7u1.diff.gz, > I see debian/rules contains this line: > > +CFLAGS += -DGMP_DESC -DLTM_DESC -DUSE_LTM > > So the flag seems to be set accordingly. > > Not quite sure what’s wrong here. Indeed, the LTM_DESC flag is set at compile time. The 1.17-3.2+deb7u1 upload should not have changed anything here. Milan, do you have an example code snippet to reproduce the bug? Cheers, jonas > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Milan Budala <milan.bud...@gmail.com > <mailto:milan.bud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Package: libtomcrypt-dev > Version: 1.17-3.2+deb7u1 > Severity: important > > Security update 1.17-3.2+deb7u1 breaks libtommath integration > ('undefined reference to ltm_desc' linking error). > No problems with version 1.17-3.2. The build should probably define > LTM_DESC. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 7.11 > APT prefers oldstable-updates > APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 3.18.17-core2-rt14 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages libtomcrypt-dev depends on: > ii libtomcrypt0 1.17-3.2+deb7u1 > > libtomcrypt-dev recommends no packages. > > libtomcrypt-dev suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
