> > Right, but that's for stretch where the sysadmin will be clearly be
> > more aware of and/or even looking for issues. I don't want to break
> > existing systems right now.
> So how are packages using gunicorn to handle support for both stretch
> and jessie-backports? Packages in jessie can't be changed, so changes
> need to take place in backports to prepare for stretch.
> Adding packages from backports should be about preparing for the next
> stable release.
I completely understand that and strongly agree, but *weighed up against*
breaking existing stable-based systems I relaly feel it the worst of two
bad options to upload it to backports.
I mean, I know I have deployed systems that--if they were to blindly
upgrade from backports after such an upload--would have a broken system!
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
