On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 03:21:16PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2016, Ricardo Fabian Peliquero wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 08:13:33AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 06 Oct 2016, Ricardo Fabian Peliquero wrote: > > > > amd64-microcode recommends dracut or initramfs-tools. Please > > > > consider recommending virtual package linux-initramfs-tool > > > > instead. That way, it would include any of these packages: dracut, > > > > initramfs-tools or tiny-initramfs. > > > > > > Have you checked whether tiny-initramfs works for amd64-microcode? > > > > Both packages are installed, and tiny-initramfs is working well on my > > system (needless to say that neither dracut nor initramfs-tools are > > installed here). Please let me know if there is way to assure you that > > amd64-microcode is working as expected also. > > Send me a copy of your initramfs image (directly, not ot the bug > report), or check in the kernel logs whether it is in fact > early-updating the microcode on your AMD processor or not... >
I will send the image directly to your email address. Anyway, this is my filtered dmesg's output: ; dmesg | grep -i micro [ 1.328121] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x010000c8 [ 1.328180] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x010000c8 [ 1.328299] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.01 <tig...@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba [ 7.844237] [drm] Loading RS780 Microcode
