On Friday, September 30, 2016 05:01:00 PM Niels Thykier wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 00:30:08 -0400 Scott Kitterman > > <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > > If that's the case, then it's premature before the freeze. Python2.7 is > > 'supported' through the expected stretch lifetime, so I don't see it being > > anything other than a maintainer call. For the next release, it'll maybe > > be different. > > > > Scott K > > I say we schedule this for December 2016 or early January 2017 then. > That would ensure that the tag is effective for the entire development > cycle of Buster. > > Would this be an acceptable compromise?
I think that's reasonable. Thanks, Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.