On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:08:42 -0600 LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> wrote: > tags 516934 + wontfix > severity 516934 wishlist > -- > > I'm going to go with the memory footprint as being significant enough to > say that it won't be built that way, since it increases the rdataslab > size.
Hi, i can agree that memory footprint may be a pain. what about delivering two version of the package, as it is for vim-tiny and vim-nox? Thanks, Daniele
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
