On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 21:18 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2016-09-14 13:01, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > This is already fixed in SVN, pending upload. > > Uploaded to unstable (361xx). Does this need updating for 364 (which > adds another kernel module)? > > > Andreas
No more changes needed for 364 and 367, builds fine with both in an i386 chroot with amd64 headers/dkms package. Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
