On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 11:17:03PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-06-28 16:40:09 [-0300], Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > upstream already has support for OpenSSL 1.1.0 in trunk for Ruby 2.4; > > see upstream bug linked above. given the current state of afairs, we > > will need to either backport that for Ruby 2.3 ourselves, or disable the > > openssl extension bundled with the interpreter and use a standalone > > ruby-openssl package. > > 2.4 is scheduled for 2016-12-25 so it is unlikely to be part of the next > Debian release, right?
right. We'll release with 2.3 > Is the backport huge (in terms of conflicts of the original patch) or is > it simpler to go for the ruby-openssl package? the external ruby-openssl is probably not ok for Ruby 2.3. whether the backport is viable is not clear yet. related: https://github.com/ruby/openssl/issues/54 Do we have a timeline for OpenSSL 1.1?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
