On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 00:04:43 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 02:40:49 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote: > [...] > > A first point would be to convert your tests to a proper test of our > > infrastructure, somewhere under t/ Once you have some automated tests, > > I will happily integrate your work in the main archive. > > This is where I need your help most: could you please do the conversion > yourself? > I am convinced that this would be the best option, since I have zero > familiarity with the test infrastructure used in po4a and I am afraid > I would mess everything up... :-p
Are you willing to convert my tests to a proper test integrated in po4a test infrastructure? I really hope you are, since I am not knowledgeable enough to do so by myself... Please let me know. Thanks a lot for any help you may provide! > > > > > Then, the next step will be to test your work against the existing > > Ruby documentation, and fix it until it works properly. > > I'll try and find a little more time and test Rd.pm against some > existing Ruby documentation. [...] I tested Rd.pm against more existing Ruby documentation, and it seems to behave correctly... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpqlWvqlZp26.pgp
Description: PGP signature