Hi, Thanks for saving lost soul.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:58:28AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > This clause is universally interpreted to mean that the permission is > granted and you don't need to pay a fee to get that permission; in other > words, "for any purpose and without fee is granted" is equivalent to > "for any purposes is granted without fee". A quick google over the > debian-legal archives shows that this issue has been discussed and > resolved as early as 1999, and that it nevertheless comes up numerous > times after that. Hmmm. I see. Good explanation, thanks. I also found: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/08/msg00049.html Good old BSD license variants... Further check dropped me to: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/02/msg00102.html This was good reference. So this license in _process.py is GPL incompatible as is. subprocess.py one is GPL compatible. Osamu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
