Control: tags -1 wontfix

On 2016-09-02 01:53:49, Markus Teich wrote:
> Heyho Antoine,
>
> wow, what a blast from the past.

Indeed. :) I'm just doing a huge cleanup in the monkeysign issue queue
here. :)

> Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2013-09-15 15:28:23, Markus Teich wrote:
>> > I have 'interactive' set in my gpg.conf.
>> 
>> ...why?
>
> I don't know, why I had it, but I just checked and apparently I disabled it
> sometime in the last 3 years.

That just goes to show. ;)

[...]

> I don't even have the system anymore, where I found this bug, but it probably
> was a Debian wheezy system. In case you want to reproduce it, just assume
> defaults appart from the "interactive" line in gpg.conf.

I guess I could easily make a test case for this...

>> > When i disable interactive mode in gpg.conf, monkeysign works as intended.
>> > A possible solution may be to remove the interactive setting from the 
>> > temporary
>> > keyrings configuration on initialization.
>> 
>> I would rather not have to start messing around parsing (and
>> rewriting!!) gpg.conf, to be honest. In #721599, there was a discussion
>> on how to *read* options in a relatively portable way:
>> 
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721599#71
>> 
>> ... but *writing* to that file is more complicated. As far as I know,
>> gpg doesn't garantee that the file format will not change and usually
>> encourages people to not mess around the data structures in the back
>> like this.
>
> The right fix would be to open an issue with gpg to introduce a 
> --no-interactive
> switch which you could then use to override the gpg.conf option I think. If
> you're actually doing this, you could also try to rename this misleading 
> option
> in the same patch. ;)

I would think that --batch would imply --no-interactive, of course. :p

Would you mind opening an issue upstream? Otherwise I can just track
this here.

>> I am tempted to mark this as "wontfix" because it's such an odd configuration
>> for me, but I could be convinced otherwise!
>
> I would not mind at all since I don't use monkeysign. I don't even remember 
> what
> was missing or if it just was this bug that kept me from using it. Hell I 
> don't
> know if the bug is still occuring after 3 years.

Understood.

The only thing left is whether we forward it to the upstream GPG
bugtrackers or assign it to the gnupg package in the Debian BTS.

We would need a backtrace first, of course, in any case.

A.

-- 
Your injured body has become the burden of your digital soul.
                        - Yin Aiwen, 2013, The Massage is the Medium

Reply via email to