Hi, Santiago. El sábado 27 de agosto del 2016 a las 22:00:31 +0200, Santiago Vila escribió:
> > > Reading the message by Adam carefully, this is a bug in sed. > > > > > > I would hope the release managers would allow this to be fixed in a > > > point release. > > Do you think it's a problem of sed specifically? Because Yves > > mentioned two other packages (lpe and ucspi-proxy) that could also > > change the permissions of /bin. > It is a problem in every package having wrong permissions, but sed is > always installed by default (it's even Essential: yes), while the > others are not. > > So if we fix sed in jessie, new installs will probably have the /bin > directory fixed. Yes, I think it would be a good starting point. Because in addition to ensure that the new installations don't have this problem introduced by an essential package, it could also fix this issue on the installations that already have been made, right? I did not know this Lintian tool used internally to verify the packages automatically. That's interesting. In the thread mentioned by Adam, Yves said that Lintian is used on testing and unstable, but he was not sure if it is also used to stable. Do you know if that's the case? Because, if so, we could use this tool to automatically identify the existence of other packages that might cause problems on the permissions for the /bin directory. > > What is not clear to me is why this happens in netinstall and not on > > LXC. Because I believe that in both cases the same package is installed. > > Or am I missing something? If you could clarify this, I would appreciate > > it. > Sorry, I don't know. No problem :-) Thanks for your time. Kind regards, -- Ing. Daniel Bareiro Opción Libre - Soberanía tecnológica para su empresa WWW: http://www.opcion-libre.com.ar Tel: +54 11 5235-3090 Correo-e: conta...@opcion-libre.com.ar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
