Hi Don,

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:40:27AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 05:16:50PM -0500, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jul 2016, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:54:00AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:49:54PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > adding t...@security.debian.org to CC and quoting in full below to 
> > > > > solicit further comments.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think Drake's proposal makes perfect sense, the current behaviour 
> > > > > is mostly historic, it
> > > > > was around before I joined the security team ten years ago.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And maybe let's add something like:
> > > > > "If you want to contact the security in private, please write to 
> > > > > t...@security.debian.org,
> > > > > if you want to discuss this on a public mailing list write to 
> > > > > debian-secur...@lists.debian.org."
> > > > 
> > > > Just a "agree" from my side. It probably would make sense to not send
> > > > replies to debian-security@l.d.o but instead have it sent to another
> > > > mail which autoreplies with a set of indications what can be done and
> > > > expand it with the above two lines. IIRC if someone tries to post to
> > > > d-s-a manually, it get's already such an autoreply, just needs to say
> > > > as well the further two contact lines.
> > > 
> > > is there any furhter information needed from the security team for
> > > this, or any other blocker?
> > 
> > The choices without significant extra engineering are to have Reply-To:
> > messages to go debian-secur...@lists.debian.org, not to set a Reply-To:
> > or to have Reply-To set to
> > debian-security-announce-requ...@lists.debian.org 
> > 
> > I'm OK with whatever y'all decide.
> 
> Let's have the Reply-To set to
> debian-security-announce-requ...@lists.debian.org, then. That will provide
> people with all the necessary information.

It would be great to have this somehow soonish. The debian-security
list is currently quite often spammed with autoreplies from people
subscribed to d-s-a.

Here is a signed ack, as well from my side additionally to Moritz'.

Regards,
Salvatore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to