On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:24:14PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:22:37PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > > Out of curiosity, why does USE_LEXWRAP take an option? It doesn't appear to > > do anything with it. > > Looking at the history, it turns out that my original idea was to use > the parameter as part of the name for the actual yywrap function. > That's just private_yywrap now. > > I've coded a better version-compare, will see about the rest, and > provide a workable diff...
(got to that point - attaching a diff which built with 2.6.0) By the way, just to remind you of one of the reasons why "new" flex is not really a good tool. Here's a diffstat comparing my usual build to "new" flex. It adds a few compiler warnings: vmw-debian8b2-64-clang-run.log | 2568 +++++ vmw-debian8b2-64-debbuild-run.log | 158 vmw-debian8b2-64-debbuild-xvile.log | 154 vmw-debian8b2-64-gcc-normal-run.log |10739 ++++++++++++++++++++++ vmw-debian8b2-64-gcc-stricter-run.log |16287 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- vmw-debian8b2-64-mingw32-run.log | 740 + vmw-debian8b2-64-mingw64-run.log | 672 + vmw-debian8b2-64-run.log | 973 +- 8 files changed, 31063 insertions(+), 1228 deletions(-) -- Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
vile-9.8r3.patch.gz
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
