On 2 August 2016 at 18:11, Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote: > in any case, I would prefer to see it fixed in unstable. > BTW such errors are normal when using backports, so fixing a single package > is worse than no fix at all (specially when the fix is "problematic") > > I would prefer to do a no-change backport, and discuss in sid the "issue" > if you prefer.
Done. I'm not sure how much of an issue it is, so I'll leave starting a discussion up to you. Thanks, Nicholas
