On 28-Jul-2016, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > It looks like pylucene is not used as dependency by any package. > Also it's pretty hard to find some other software that depends on > pylucene (except ReviewBoard that is another story)
Yes, ReviewBoard was why I wanted to have an up-to-date ‘pylucene’ in Debian. > Do you use it somehow? Or do you have any plans to use it? A quick search on my system shows that I had no other reference to that library. > I'm considering whether to package latest pylucene or just orphan > it. I hope that helps your decision :-) -- \ “To have the choice between proprietary software packages, is | `\ being able to choose your master. Freedom means not having a | _o__) master.” —Richard M. Stallman, 2007-05-16 | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
