On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > So the part with the missing file is nearly clear - at least I cannot > imagine how tetex could be responsible for it being deleted. But the > segfault should be investigated; I'm unsure whether I just should > reassign to perl - what do others think?
This is really not an answer to that question, but perl-tk wasn't a required dependency of tetex-doc in sid. I added it to the apt-get line when I first got tetex-doc anyway - I figured I'd want it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
