Michael Biebl: > Hi > > Am 19.07.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Niels Thykier: >> [...] >> >> Michael/Martin: What is your take - should we just disable the service >> handling in dh_installinit for compat 10 or newer? AFAICT, it should >> "just work(tm)" and now would be the time to do it if we want it in >> compat 10. > > The interaction between dh_installinit and dh_systemd_* is a bit tricky > and it's been a while since I looked at it. So I'm a bit wary to simply > disable the systemd specific parts. This would need a closer look. > > In general, I certainly agree though that we want to reduce the > duplicate functionality. I'm just not entirely sure yet, if merging the > dh_systemd_* helpers into dh_installinit or pulling the systemd specific > bits out of dh_installinit into dh_systemd_* is the way to go. > Both approaches have their pros and cons. > > Regards, > Michael >
Can you elaborate on the pros/cons you see? AFAICT, pushing it all to dh_systemd_* in compat 10 or compat 11 would "just work" for the dh-sequencer (and we can have cdbs work as well). For other uses, it is just a question of documenting in the compat change (which may or may not be an argument for pushing it to compat 11). Thanks, ~Niels