On 14/07/16 at 22:41 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2016-07-14 <20160714193124.ga31...@xanadu.blop.info> > > > TBH, I'm not even sure if this is a bug. "user" is so overly generic > > > that it shouldn't be used as a user name in the first place. > > > > Hi, > > > > Well, I agree, but for the same reason, it's probably a bad idea to rely > > on it not existing in a test suite ;) > > Fwiw, I think it is used there is because "user" is a reserved word, > so the effect there is to test the grammar to see if > CREATE USER user; fails as expected, while > CREATE USER "user"; still works. > > > > Lucas, can't you just use "buildd" or the like? > > > > Yes, I will change the username used in the rebuilds. > > Thanks. I agree the behavior in PG isn't 100% optimal, but I don't see > this being fixed upstream, so I'll close the bug here.
Hi, JFTR: changing the username in my setup allowed to build succcessfully (which was expected). Lucas
