Control: found -1 1.3~pre2 On 2013-10-27 11:39:02 -0800, Jes Slow wrote: > If you look at your extended_states file, there's likely to be a few > packages which have Auto-Installed: 0. These are manually installed, right? > That's what apt-mark showmanual thinks anyway. Why are these there?
That's also what aptitude thinks: cventin:~> aptitude why libutf8proc1 Manually installed, current version 1.3.1-2, priority optional No dependencies require to install libutf8proc1 while I have: Package: libutf8proc1 Architecture: amd64 Auto-Installed: 0 However, this package was installed automatically. From the apt history: Start-Date: 2016-07-13 21:37:27 Commandline: apt install julia julia-doc Install: julia:amd64 (0.4.6-1), libopenlibm2:amd64 (0.5.1+dfsg-1, automatic), libutf8proc1:amd64 (1.3.1-2, automatic), libjs-mathjax:amd64 (2.6.1-1, automatic), julia-doc:amd64 (0.4.6-1), libspqr2:amd64 (1:4.5.3-1, automatic), libdsfmt-19937-1:amd64 (2.2.3+dfsg-2, automatic), fonts-mathjax:amd64 (2.6.1-1, automatic), libjs-underscore:amd64 (1.7.0~dfsg-1, automatic), sphinx-rtd-theme-common:amd64 (0.1.9-1, automatic), libpcre2-8-0:amd64 (10.21-1, automatic), libopenblas-base:amd64 (0.2.18-1, automatic), libunwind8:amd64 (1.1-4.1, automatic), julia-common:amd64 (0.4.6-1, automatic), libarpack2:amd64 (3.4.0-1, automatic), libopenspecfun1:amd64 (0.5.2-1, automatic), libjs-modernizr:amd64 (2.6.2+ds1-1, automatic), libjs-sphinxdoc:amd64 (1.4.4-3, automatic) End-Date: 2016-07-13 21:37:40 So, the bug is still there in apt 1.3~pre2 (I had upgraded to this version a few days before). -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
