tags 762829 confirmed upstream help thanks It's been a while but it hasn't been forgotten ...
Peter wrote...
> Some Pascal source files are classified as Ruby.
> Maybe file is confused by the keywords 'module', 'import' and export,
> which are valid Pascal extension keywords in ISO 10206?
Correct, the "module" keyword in the first line of your example
triggers one of the tests for ruby (magic/Magdir/ruby:25).
However I'm reluctant to change this as it easily might create
false-positives. If there's is a distinct rule to tell Ruby and
Pascal apart, I'll happily forward it to upstream.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
