On 07/16/2016 01:31 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> On 16.07.2016 18:22, tony mancill wrote: >> [...] >>> I'd like to discuss options with the Java Team. For example, we could >>> change mh_install to ignore '-i' when not passed in conjunction with a >>> maven.ignoreRules file, or change the DH sequencer, and probably some >>> other better options that I'm not creative enough to think of right now. >> >> Hi, >> >> I think >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/805228 >> >> is the best place to discuss this issue. > > Indeed. > > > One thing that you might want to do is to identify the affected > packages. The complete list of bugs I reported regarding > "dpkg-buildpackage -A" is available here in case it helps: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=binary-indep;users=sanv...@debian.org
Hi Santiago, Thanks for the list. For 806640, the only bug that appears in this list related to mh_install 805228, I will mark it as blocked by 805228, but I won't reassign. It might be worth noting that there are other arch:all packages that FTBFS with the same mh_install issue, but don't appear in your list of binary-indep packages. Did your test build perhaps exclude packages that are strictly arch:all - as compared to src:libnative-platform-java, which builds both arch:any and arch:all binary packages? Put another way, do we need to be concerned that the strictly arch:all packages for this binary-indep tag? Cheers, tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
