> According to > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/minidlna.html > it has now problem with reproducible builds, isn't it?
Sorry, I'm having difficulty parsing this.
> And I believe that parsing /etc/issue.net or lsb_release is a little
> bit better, because packages from Ubuntu or any other derivatives should
> not have "Debian" inside it's version (or description).
Ah, good idea!
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
