Hi, 2.6.3 is due to be roll next week. I'm looking at it as a new release candidate. There were efforts to arrange a BSP this weekend, but I'm not sure how many of the upstream developers are actually going to take part in it... that is a separate issue though. :(
cheers, Ron On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:46:05PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > * Ron [Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:26:13 +0930]: > > > No problem. I'll bust them up again for the next upload. > > Hey Ron, any progress with this? > > Cheers, > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:36:33PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > > > Package: libwxgtk2.6-0 > > > Version: 2.6.1.2 > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hi! > > > > I'd like to ask for the libwxgtk2.6-0 package to be split into > > > libwxgtk2.6-0 and libwxbase2.6-0, so that packages that only link > > > against libwxbase can be installed without pulling gtk2 and other X11 > > > libraries in (which can prove useful e.g. on a server). > > > > Not sure if you'll remember, but we had a discussion about this on IRC > > > several weeks ago. The agreement we reached was that I would file this > > > request after a package in the Debian archive would benefit from this > > > (so that the split did not happen needlessly). So now there is one: > > > starting with 2.0.3-3, the amule package provides an amule-daemon > > > binary package whose only binary (/usr/bin/amuled) links against > > > libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0, and libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0, but not against > > > any _gtk2 variant. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > -- > Adeodato Sim?? dato at net.com.org.es > Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org > > Proper treatment will cure a cold in seven days, but left to itself, a > cold will hang on for a week. > -- Darrell Huff > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
