On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 19:46 +0200, hikaru.deb...@web.de wrote: > It turned out, I had extra characters in my debian/rules file, most likely due > to a mistake while copying the patch from the wiki. This crippled my tar > command, but didn't make it completely useless. > So much for "following instructions". ;-) > Thanks for your patience! > > In the end I manually installed these packages: > > libegl1-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libegl-nvidia0_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libgl1-nvidia-glx_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libgles1-glvnd-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libgles2-glvnd-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libglvnd-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libglx0-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libglx-nvidia0_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libnvidia-eglcore_367.27-1_amd64.deb > libnvidia-ml1_367.27-1_amd64.deb > nvidia-alternative_367.27-1_amd64.deb > nvidia-driver_367.27-1_amd64.deb > nvidia-driver-bin_367.27-1_amd64.deb > nvidia-kernel-dkms_367.27-1_amd64.deb > nvidia-kernel-support_367.27-1_amd64.deb > nvidia-vdpau-driver_367.27-1_amd64.deb > xserver-xorg-video-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb > > > I also needed these packages from jessie-backports: > > glx-alternative-nvidia > libvdpau1 > nvidia-kernel-common > nvidia-modprobe > > > It wasn't necessary, but I thought it wouldn't hurt, to install > nvidia-installer-cleanup from the backports too. > > Now I have this list of packages installed: > > # dpkg -l | grep nvidia > ii glx-alternative-nvidia 0.7.3~bpo8+1 > amd64 allows the selection of NVIDIA as GLX provider > ii libegl-nvidia0:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary EGL libraries > ii libegl1-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary EGL stub libraries > ii libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL libraries > ii libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 1.x stub libraries > ic libgles1-nvidia:amd64 340.96-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 1.x libraries > ii libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 2.x stub libraries > ic libgles2-nvidia:amd64 340.96-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 2.x libraries > ii libglvnd-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary GL vendor neutral libraries > ii libglx-nvidia0:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary GLX libraries > ii libglx0-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 Vendor neutral GL dispatch library -- libGLX > ii libnvidia-eglcore:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary EGL core libraries > ii libnvidia-ml1:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA Management Library (NVML) runtime library > ii nvidia-alternative 367.27-1 > amd64 allows the selection of NVIDIA as GLX provider > ii nvidia-driver 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA metapackage > ii nvidia-driver-bin 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA driver support binaries > ii nvidia-installer-cleanup 20151021+1~bpo8+1 > amd64 cleanup after driver installation with the nvidia-installer > ii nvidia-kernel-common 20151021+1~bpo8+1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary kernel module support files > ii nvidia-kernel-dkms 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary kernel module DKMS source > ii nvidia-kernel-support 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary kernel module support files > ii nvidia-legacy-check 367.27-1 > amd64 check for NVIDIA GPUs requiring a legacy driver > ii nvidia-modprobe 358.09-1~bpo8+1 > amd64 utility to load NVIDIA kernel modules and create device nodes > rc nvidia-settings 340.46-2 > amd64 tool for configuring the NVIDIA graphics driver > ii nvidia-support 20151021+1~bpo8+1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary graphics driver support files > ii nvidia-vdpau-driver:amd64 367.27-1 > amd64 Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix - NVIDIA driver > ii xserver-xorg-video-nvidia 367.27-1 > amd64 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver > > > I'm wondering about two things: > > 1. I still have libgles1-nvidia and libgles2-nvidia from 340 on my system, > while there are only libgles1-glvnd-nvidia and libgles2-glvnd-nvidia for 367. > Are the latter two packages equivalent to the former ones or should I have > packages without "glvnd" for 367?
Can't remember off the top of my head, but there was a lot of reshuffling due to the glvnd, some of which has not yet been merged up from 361 to 367. In general if a branch doesn't build a package anymore, you don't need it and you should remove it. > 2. Is the old nvidia-settings package (or its removal) a problem? > I see, there is no 367 svn package. [1] nvidia-settings is separate and largely independent, it's not strictly tied to the drivers version, as long as it's somewhat recent it will be fine > I also found a GT520 card to test with, so I have something that's actually > supported by the driver. As far as I can tell, it works fine. The desktop > comes > up and I can play videos using OpenGL via the card. > > > [1] > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-nvidia/packages/nvidia-settings/branches/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
