Hi Peter, On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:53:21PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Hi Jordi, > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:18:49AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > This is all good news! I still use fcgiwrap myself so co-maintaining > > sounds about right (although I'm happy to downgrade myself to Uploader > > and have you as the main Maintainer if you want). > > Great! I would be fine either way, but Maintainer might be better for > the sake of hinting (when the time comes) that I am ready to become DD. > > > Also happy about svn → git, it's something that's been on the list for > > all of my packages but I've never come around to it. > > Please take a close look at the carefully restored history: > > git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/pc-guest/fcgiwrap.git > > I have split the larger svn commits into multiple git commits so that > each commit corresponds to one changelog entry. I verified that the > debian/ tags match exactly the versions in snapshot.debian.org.
Woa, you've spent quite a bit doing this right? I can't spot a single nitpick here. Nice! > Would you be fine if we generate the changelog using "gbp dch" only > right before each upload? This keeps the history simple and avoids > potential merge conflicts in the changelog. Yeah, that's fine. Whatever, if it's the recommended way in DEP14. As in this case there's no strong recommendation, I can be convinced to do gbp dch. I really hope I won't forget, as editing the changelog has been part of my workflow for 15+ years. :) > > I can give you the DM upload permissions straight away; I'm very happy > > about you joining and caring about fcgiwrap! > > Yes, that would be nice. > > Could you also advocate for me to join collab-maint? I sent a request > myself on alioth, but so far my account (pc-guest) has not been added. Ok. Any pointer where I should be advocating you? > That would be my next step after uploading the current version. I will > see how to best integrate our patches and file pull requests upstream. > > There is an open pull request [1] for a multi-instance systemd unit, > which would allow running fcgiwrap under multiple users using the same > systemd template, instead of running everything under www-data. In > case of a serious bug in one CGI app, this separation prevents the > hijacking of other CGI apps or the webserver itself. That sounds useful, yes! > [1] https://github.com/gnosek/fcgiwrap/pull/17 Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
