On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:23:10AM +0300, merlettaia wrote: > Hi Andreas, > I've looked at `libtfbs-perl`, it seems that it already has testsuite > similar to those produced by `autopkgtest-pkg-perl`. > If you think it's better to use it instead of your testsuite in > debian/tests/,
Funny - thanks for explaining me that I did something I simply forgot and failed to check. ;-) I can change it (but for me it checks almost the same things > - and if debian/tests/control present, tests from autopkgtest-pkg-perl > won't be run if not to allow them in control file like this: > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/pkg-perl-tools.git/tree/autopkgtest/examples/default-tests-control > ). > > There is a problem with one of tests: t/04_DB_TRANSFAC.t (you skip this > test in run-unit-test). > It seems that this tests fails because service is not available anymore, > not because of network problems. > When I open url, produced by following line in script, by hand: > > my $pfm1 = $db->get_Matrix_by_acc('M00039'); > > it redirects me to this page: > > http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/tess?request=MTX-DBRTRV-Accno&key=M00039 > > It seems that this test fails not because network errors, but because that > online service is not reachable any more. And probably it should be removed > from testsuite, how do you think? ACK. Feel free to commit a patch. Thanks a lot for double checking my work Andreas. > 2016-06-24 17:22 GMT+03:00 Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>: > > > Hi Bas, > > > > I moved the package to Git and importet your patches. > > > > > > Tanya, since this seems to be the right moment and you have gathered > > experience > > with testst in Perl packages: Would you mind adding a test to > > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/libtfbs-perl.git > > > > to have a soon upload after moving VCS with sensible changes? > > > > Kind regards > > > > Andreas. > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:09:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 02:45:14 +0200 Bas Couwenberg wrote: > > > > As part of the PDL update to 2.016 [0], all its reverse dependencies > > have > > > > been rebuilt in preparation of the transition (from pdlapi-10 to > > pdlapi-12). > > > > > > > > While libtfbs-perl doesn't require changes for the upcoming pdl > > > > transition, I couldn't resist updating the package to incorporate some > > > > best practices. > > > > > > > > Please condider applying the attached patches. > > > > > > > > [0] > > https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/2016-June/100093.html > > > > > > A couple additional patches have been applied in todays NMU. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > Bas > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > > > debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging > > > > > > -- > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > > > -- > Best wishes, > Tanya. -- http://fam-tille.de
