Hi Chris, Thanks for the patch. I remember this issue has already popped up a while ago, and I have taken steps to ensure the 'build_date' define is ignored when aghermann is built for debian: https://github.com/hmmr/aghermann/blob/master/debian/rules#L7 and https://github.com/hmmr/aghermann/blob/master/upstream/src/aghermann/print_version.cc#L18.
If the resulting binary still ends up being build time-dependent, then it must be for some other reason. Can you confirm that it is the case? Cheers, Andrei On 23 June 2016 at 21:12, Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> wrote: > Source: aghermann > Version: 1.0.9-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: timestamps > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > > Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that > aghermann could not be built reproducibly. > > Patch attached. > > [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds > > > Regards, > > -- > ,''`. > : :' : Chris Lamb > `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk > `-
