On 23 Jun (15:16:03), intrigeri wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 dgou...@ev0ke.net > > Hi David, > > I'm sorry I didn't forward this to you earlier, but denying > sched_getaffinity syscall breaks ffmpeg: > https://bugs.debian.org/805741 > > If it is safe to white-list this syscall, perhaps this could go into > 2.2 final?
I just pushed a commit upstream for this: commit e389c99937a35815e2752952634cc80c3aaf1d4e It's working here so hopefully it fixes the issue for you :). Cheers! David > > Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:57:59 +0100 > From: intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> > To: "torsocks.debbug@discard.email" <torsocks.debbug@discard.email> > Cc: 805...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Bug#805741: torsocks: [syscall] Unsupported syscall number 242 > > Control: retitle -1 Denied sched_getaffinity syscall breaks ffmpeg > Control: tag -1 + upstream > Control: found -1 2.1.0-1 > > Hi, > > > It looks like the syscall in question is sys_sched_getaffinity > > Indeed: > > * on amd64 I see: > > https://sources.debian.net/src/linux/3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u6~bpo70+1/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl/#L213 > * on i386 you saw: > > https://sources.debian.net/src/linux/3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u6~bpo70+1/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl/#L251 > > Cheers, > -- > intrigeri > > > -- > intrigeri
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
