>On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:31:47PM +0200, Simon Ruderich wrote:
>> Instead of installing the helper as setuid one could also install
>> it as setgid with a specific kerberos group which can read the
>> keytab. Then in the worst case the keytab is compromised. The
>> existing patch supports this approach.

Any objections against using it as setgid instead of setuid? This
would work fine as well and prevent serious privilege escalation.

Regards
Simon
-- 
+ privacy is necessary
+ using gnupg http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x1972F726F0D556E7

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to