Am 09.06.2016 um 07:57 schrieb Martin Pitt: > Michael Biebl [2016-06-09 2:29 +0200]: >> At some point, shuffling the libraries around becomes a nuisance. Maybe >> we should only do that for /lib/systemd/systemd and eventually >> /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd. > > We got two RC bugs before we had this check, but I don't remember > whether this was before the initramfs-tools change that mounts /usr. > But even with that I'm sure that we have a very small number of users > who believe that separate /usr without initramfs was ever supported, > and I'm sort of tired about arguing against that.. > > Anyway, we can certainly trim that check a bit, but only these two > aren't sufficient -- we at least need to cover the generators, fsck, > networkd, reply-passwd, etc. -- seems easier and safer to whitelist > programs like timesyncd or timedated which are safe. > > Not sure where this linking would end up, I suppose in networkd?
/lib/systemd/systemd-networkd and /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn if I checked correctly. That > would then break with /usr being on the network and not using an > initrd. As I said, I have very little sympathy for that, but see > above.. Oh, the mythical /usr-on-NFS case. I don't see how that would work with networkd anyway, it having a After=dbus.service… -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
