On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:04:12AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:00:57AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > This package should use /usr/share/sbuild instead of /usr/lib/sbuild, > > as it does only contain architecture-independent stuff. > > Actually, I think we should move the stuff from /usr/lib/sbuild to > /usr/bin, possibly having some prefix to avoid namespace pollution. Does > anybody what was the rationale for having it in /usr/lib in the first > place? > > How about /usr/bin/sbuild-apt instead of chrapt, etc.? >
It is surely more correct, but for the problem of eventually breaking other user's scripts. Indeed, wanna-build sbuild scripts can be considered a different fork, so there is no reason to retain compatibility on that regard. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
