Package: socat
Version: 2.0.0~beta4-1.1
Severity: wishlist

readline support in socat is disabled for good licensing reasons (see
#632481), but line editing support is practical (and advertised in the
man page).

it seems that the editline library (or possibly the unpackaged linenoise
library) could provide a drop-in replacement for most of api and
functionality. the netkit-ftp-ssl package uses a moderate patch to
achieve that[1], something similar could be possible for socat as well.
my own attempts at that failed already at building the unmodified socat,
which i can't track down any further right now.

this wishlist item is something that could well go to the upstream
wishlist as well, but it is my impression that it's primarily debian and
similarly strict distributions where the issue itches.


thanks for providing the socat package
chrysn

[1] 
https://sources.debian.net/patches/netkit-ftp-ssl/0.17.33%2B0.2-2/640_use_editline.diff/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-rc1+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages socat depends on:
ii  libc6        2.22-10
ii  libssl1.0.0  1.0.2d-1
ii  libwrap0     7.6.q-25

socat recommends no packages.

socat suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
  -- Bene Gesserit axiom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to