It was not intended to install plugins to multi-arch dir. This topic was discused already once without a clear result :( http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-January/036278.html
mira 2016-06-01 2:58 GMT+02:00 Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com>: > On 31 May 2016 at 16:27, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Will be fixed soon. >> >> mira >> >> 2016-05-31 20:42 GMT+02:00 Javier Serrano Polo <jav...@jasp.net>: >>> El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +0000, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure: >>>> + * Fix multi-arch path. >>> >>> Will the plug-ins be installed under /usr/lib/*/ladspa? I would be in >>> favor, but AFAIK this would be the first Debian package to ship LADSPA >>> plug-ins under a multiarch folder instead of /usr/lib/ladspa. > > A few of my hopefully-baseless worries: > > Would someone please confirm that this is a mechanism in place to > insure that any of /usr/lib/*/ladspa and /usr/lib/ladspa will be > correctly added to $LADSPA_PATH? Also, will the multiarch approach > necessitate a LADSPA32_PATH LADSPA64_PATH in the case of a mixed i386 > and amd64 system? Or is this the beginning of a formal transition > from /usr/lib/ladspa to /usr/lib/$primary_arch/ladspa? > > Sincerely, > Nicholas
