Am 19.05.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: > On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 18:27 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Could we add the Important: yes field to "init"? Having that makes a >> lot of sense to me. > > To init or to its dependencies (systemd-sysv, sysvinit-core)? The > latter would not only warn when uninstalling all init systems, but also > when switching between them (perhaps not by intention).
To "init" I guess. I don't think we should pester users with that message if they deliberately switch to an alternative. The main objective of having Important:yes in init would be to avoid "accidentally" uninstalling /sbin/init and rendering your system unbootable. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
